Extradition is the formal process where one country asks another to return a person to stand trial or to serve a sentence. Under multilateral conventions and bilateral extradition treaties, the UK has extradition relations with over 100 territories around the world.
What Is the Process?
The requesting State contacts the UK authorities and makes an extradition request. This may result in a warrant being issued against you, and court proceedings commenced.
It might be the case that you fear an extradition request will be made in the future - if so, you should contact us without delay so that we can advise on the options available.
Save in very exceptional circumstances your case will be heard before a District Judge sitting at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London.
Once formalities are dealt with, the court will consider whether the tests for extradition are met. In some cases, the final decision will rest with the Home Secretary.
In some instances, a case can be disposed of very quickly, in others, it will involve a contested hearing.
The exact process will depend on which extradition regime is being applied, as it varies between requesting States.
Do I Need a Solicitor?
Yes, is the simple answer. Extradition Law is incredibly complex, and there are no circumstances where it is appropriate to try and navigate your way through this legal maze.
A duty solicitor will be available at Court to assist you, but even at that stage, you can insist that we are contacted to help - the earlier we are instructed in the proceedings, the better equipped we will be to assist you.
In some cases, it will be appropriate to use specially trained counsel (barristers) who specialise in extradition law.
Experienced extradition lawyers can advise you on the processes and how an extradition request might be opposed.
Bars to Extradition
- rule against double jeopardy
- the absence of a prosecution decision (whether the prosecution case against the accused is sufficiently advanced)
- extraneous considerations (whether the request for extradition is improperly motivated)
- passage of time the requested person’s age
- speciality (the requested person must only be dealt with in the requested state for the offences for which they have been extradited)
- onward extradition (where the requested person has previously been extradited to the UK from a third county, and consent for onward extradition from that country is required but has not been forthcoming)
- forum (whether it would be more appropriate for the requested person to be prosecuted in the UK instead)
The judge must also decide if extradition would be disproportionate or would be incompatible with the requested person’s human rights (for example the right to family life is a person has been settled in this Country for some time). If the judge decides it would be both proportionate and compatible, extradition must be ordered.
Note that the process is different when the final extradition decision is to be made by the Home Secretary.
It is vital that all available evidence is presented during the hearing, and this may involve testimony from experts both in this Country and from abroad.
In a significant number of cases, further avenues of appeal are available to the High Court, and the Supreme Court.
Is Funding Available?
Legal aid may be available depending on your financial circumstances, alternatively we will be able to offer a privately funded package.
We have experience and expertise in this area and have helped clients facing extradition over a number of years. We have successfully highlighted bars to avoid extradition including on appeal.
Here are some examples of cases that our associate solicitor Deborah Hogg, who specialises in this area, has dealt with
- Hungary –v- F – Extradition Arrest Warrant (‘EAW’) withdrawn for a client with extensive psychiatric history and physical health issues.
- Poland –v- L – EAW successfully challenged upon the basis that it did not contain an offence amenable to extradition.
- Spain –v- B – EAW successfully challenged for a client with multiple medical problems and unfit to travel.
- Hungary – v N- 15 years old with severe learning difficulties. EAW challenged upon the basis that the offences did not contain adequate particulars and interfered with the right to family life.
- C-v- Romania- Successfully appealed to the High Court. EAW challenged upon the basis that prison conditions in Romania not adequate, also argued that extradition would interfere with the right to family life.
- B–v- Poland – Successfully appealed to the High Court upon the basis of the client’s established work history in UK and the length of sentence on the warrant, also argued that extradition interfered with the right to family life
- J v Latvia- Successfully appealed to the High Court having advanced argument that client was only charged because he complained about his mistreatment at the hands of the police.
- K v- X- application for leave to the Supreme Court to certify a point of law of general public importance. Ongoing
Leave Nothing To Chance
The prospect of being returned to another country to face legal proceedings is daunting. It is, therefore, essential that you seek out expert assistance at an early stage.
Please contact Deborah Hogg on 0207 935 3522 or 07958 704946 or by email on email@example.com or if urgent and outside office hours please call our emergency number 07973 259382.
Whatever your personal circumstances the above is only a guide and we would advise you to contact us to obtain definitive advice as you will appreciate that each person’s circumstances are unique to them.